What are the different models of auditing and which one proves to guarantee the most independence? Here are the various models:
The service provider outsources the audit to be performed and the client is not involved in any direct communication with the manufacturer regarding the audit. The client may issue their queries to be addressed in the audit to the service provider who ensures that the client’s requirements are met. However, any commercial interest between the client who purchases the product and the manufacturer who sells the product is completely omitted from the equation.
In commissioning an independent auditing company to perform the audit on their behalf, the service provider will receive the audit report no matter the outcome of the audit and can pass this on to the client.
An auditing company which is accredited to the highest level (Type A ISO I7020), for example by a German accreditation body, works according to the strictest of criteria. Their standard is to perform audits by qualified auditors with sufficient on-site time and to issue product-specific reports following internal review of the reports. They have a quality management system in place, the absence of conflict of interest of the auditors is guaranteed, and they regularly train their auditors. This raises the standard of audits to the highest level and ensures that regulatory requirements are met.
Last but not least, the acceptance of audit reports by authorities worldwide is paramount when taking into consideration what type of audit to pursue.
The highest level of independence and complete absence of conflict of interest can be proven to authorities with a four-party audit system which involves the client, the service provider, the auditing company and the manufacturer.
Putting an extra party into the equation reduces any element of doubt and erases the possibility of any influence on the audit itself. The auditor is obliged to deliver an independent and honest examination of the manufacturer. This is only possible when the auditor himself is completely independent and is paid no matter the outcome of the audit; the auditor is neither influenced by the manufacturer nor the client.
Instead of just two (client and manufacturer) or three (client – auditing company – manufacturer) parties involved, a four-party system is an ideal solution. The “fourth” party can be a service provider who organises audits on behalf of one or several clients. In this way, the service provider will receive the audit report no matter the outcome of the audit. Therefore any influence on the audit by any of the parties involved is prevented.
Quality audits from a service-provider can also be a cost-effective solution for clients when it comes to audits performed on behalf of several clients at once.
To learn more about our own 4-way /-party audit system and the high quality audits performed by an independent and accredited company, please contact us here at Diapharm: audits(at)diapharm. .com